The very British apart-hood: Mr. "Professor" who didn't know what apartheid meant....

Is it just a coincident that all full time or seasonal apartheid regimes ever existed were in countries created by or directly under the influence of the British? I was recently researching Wouter Basson an South African allegedly working on bio-ethnic weapons. In documents published by Wikileaks his associations with Lybia are discussed and also the very mysterious "British contact" that had told him if things go wrong he should go to Heathrow airport in London and then he will be picked up. In my book, Militarizations, I have discussed why Mummar Ghaddafi shall be considered a very near friend of British Military Intelligence Industrial Complex (MICix). So the connections of Mr. Basson with Lybia don't surprise me. I also have described in the book the infiltration of MICix in Iranian military both before and after Iranian revolution as well as how Mehdi Hashemi and his possible contacts with Lybia played a role in Iran gate affairs. At the core of British policy of apart-hood is their protocol of victimising minority groups which I explain here further.

A while ago I was watching a propaganda film which described policies of Stalin in regards to minority groups supposedly out of Stalin's mouth: We don't execute Jews like the Fascists, we put them in our nuclear facilities and other dangerous industries to die gradually. The British version of fascism however have taken things to a much more complicated level than what Stalin has done. The minorities are given the impression that they are hired in military and are even working for intelligence. However the poor guys are mostly used and abused as only low level informants that are doing a very dangerous job.

Recently professor Moshirian published an article in "The Australian" (or as I call it "The unAustralian" ) which has a number of very interesting aspects. The article refers to "apartheid" in Islamic republic of Iran against the Baha'i people.One very interesting aspect of professor https://dremamy.blogspot.com.au/2016/09/blog-post.html Moshirian's article is a photo of president Rouhani and references to "apartheid". Considering the mythical weight of the name "Rouhani", I am wondering if this is a cover up for parts of Iranian clergy and Iranian intelligence service that are extensively connected with the British Military Intelligence Industrial Complex (MICix). The mythical meanings of names and also corruption in British education system have been discussed in a number of articles in Persian (see an interesting fiction but very relevant story here). This author who has been previously seriously advocating for the rights of minority groups has been recently doing some research on the possible secret connections between the Baha'i and some of very powerful politicians in I.R.Iran and particularly a very secretive group of Anglophile clergy in Iran. The author has been looking for more examples of very unfit people with high academic positions in the British (and unfortunately some Australian )universities, having connections with cults and secret societies, some of them lacking the basic understanding of very simple issues of their field. In that light the fact that "Professor" Moshirian doesn't understand the meaning of word "apartheid" was not surprising. As an structural engineer, I try my best to help Mr. Professor to understand things better:
Firstly, Apartheid is relevant when a minority is in power and is neglecting the basic rights of majority. I am sure Mr. Professor are aware this is not the case in I. R. Iran. Secondly, and to clarify more, I help Mr. Professor with a number of examples. In Iran, before the revolution, there was a cult, very interconnected with other secret societies ,that had a lot of financial influence while there were occasions of people from majority sect being very harshly punished only for criticising the fundamentalist cult. Does Mr. Professor know name of that cult? Now, that is called "apartheid", Mr. Professor. These people from that cult talk a lot about peace but they were running the corrupt arm deals with British MICix. That behavior is called "Hippocratic", Mr. Professor. That experience hasn't helped the cult to grow and for example learn that if they have lots of influence and powerful friends in Australia they shouldn't use it against innocent members of other minorities. I suppose you know the name of that cult, Mr. Professor.

As mentioned in my book (link at the end) the majority of members of the cults are victims of MICix paying the price for MICix possibly using membership in a cult as one of their favourite covers while spying against national interests of Iranian people. Another interesting aspect of Mr. Professors article is being published in "The Australian" which has had a very active Muslim bashing core of Journalists for years (including the wife of a so called " anti-terrorism" expert and member of an Egyptian secret society who I believe played a role in Syrian disaster). Their actions and Shameful acts of some fascists in setting up a road accident for this author and other set ups and invasions of his rights and privacy are listed elsewhere. Being very committed to defending the rights of minorities, this author does not have any respect for the mind set of a minority that completely forgets the human right issues when it comes to other minorities. In a discussion I had with one member of one such cult about execution of leftist prisoners in Iran and why they are silent about it, he claimed it was a very different case because they were communists!!! In the same site in Persian some mythical connections of some of the executioners and possibility of their indirect connections with the MICix members under Baha'i cover has been discussed.

In discussions with another "Professor" and member of the cult, he claimed that the main reason for him going back to the cult was the story of a Baha'i man "cooked alive" in Iran by "Iranian people". Let's analyse this in detail. For a "religion" speaking of love and peace this is not a good starting point for a believer. I will discuss if that story is the truth, or whole of truth, but even if it is, what kind of lesson that story has for the new generation of Baha'i kids? Isn't it very hateful? Do they expect their young kids under such teachings to be in full control of their emotions and not committing a horrific crime against that "majority bastard Iranians" who did it to them, and maybe, to some innocent person that has even been advocating for rights of minorities? Now, here is another example. Look at below picture published by another Baha'i writer on the Internet. I t claims that hundreds of holes were created in the body of a Babi person and (while he was alive!) candles were put inside these holes to burn him alive. Now the very educated writer of this nonsense wants us to believe that such a thing is possible based on physics and medical science?

 As far as we know the worst atrocities committed during torture of people in captivity are those committed by the Iranian intelligence services. Still, never anybody claimed they have done such a thing. Do these fellow Baha'i people want us to believe the civilians in Iran, just out of religious beliefs, have been able to commit such atrocities to another human being? I don't believe it but if that has happened, maybe before that, one member of MICix under cover of being Baha'i or Babi had done such a horrific thing to those civilians that made them act like that? Anyhow, how that fits with the message of love and peace? Your kids learning these lessons and hypothetically having access to some "chemicals", should have very high emotional intelligence not to use it against a not suspecting and naive and at the same time innocent "Iranian".

The crimes committed in Auschwitz were horrific as they were and anybody adding exaggerations such as "live people being burnt" is NOT a friend of Jewish people. Isn't Mr. Professor playing the same game here while he could simply talk about all sorts of discrimination, imprisoning and other unfair treatments of Baha'i minority in Iran. Isn't he harming the whole cause of defending the human rights by saying things that are so unrealistic that may cause people to doubt about the whole story of inhuman treatment of the cult members in Iran?

Our world is not in "black and white". It is possible that a group that has gone through serious injustice, prosecution, educational discrimination and so on, commits or helps with or at least neglects similar crimes against another minority in another time or place. I have had the courage to fight all of these even when I was in Iran. Does Mr. Professor has the courage to look at what the "cult" has been doing?

www.militarizations.blogspot.com