BP, Slavemasons and British government: "lessons not learnt"

BP, Slavemasons and British government: "lessons not learnt"

Just mention that BP in this story stands for the company called "Bastards Petroleum" and in no way should be mistaken

with British Petroleum that is the most environmentally responsible company in the history and has never been involved in

 even smallest environmental issue. They are very transparent and have never contributed in corrupting governments

 or helping with coups in third world countries. Their new trade mark has lots of "Green" in it...God, how much I love

 that beautiful green color...So to ensure we don't mix two companies I refer to the other one (Bastards Petroleum) as BBP.

For a long time I have been trying to answer the question of who has been behind disasters Iran has gone through in last 60

years and the list of suspects look similar to those who may have had something to do with crimes against myself:

British Kapos, Slavemasons, British big business and finally British government.

In the end I concluded that the difficulty of finding the main guilty party is that there is no clear boundary between them. And the reason is that they share

a great deal of "motivation" and "interests" in what they pursue. The Slavemasons in countries like Iran and Australia

for sure are betraying the national interests of these countries but for sure its not the case in UK. British secrete

agencies should act in interest of UK and while dealing with actions of the British big business in the end

come to the conclusion that they should in fact support them in any way they can (case of BBP and coup against only democratic government in Iran).

What makes the British completely different is the "conservatism" and "fundamentalism"that has deep roots in their history.

This is a country that always has been a inspiration to states with least respect for "separation of church and estate" by introducing

monarch as head of state. I have previously mentioned how British brotherhoods are in near contact with brotherhoods in

Arab countries and how I see them the main source of support for fundamentalism and terrorism around the world.

I have also mentioned their infiltration in Iranian agencies and their support for crimes against humanity that were

committed in Iran. But what worries me is that the British have not learnt any lessen and again have gone to their

old library of conspiracies and have picked the Iranian book to repeat it all around middle East. The brotherhood boomerang they through (or as beautifully pictured in Futurama cartoon
series the garbage ball they shoot into outer space) came back and hit New York several years later. The question is when
the boomerang of so called "Arab spring" will hit us? Will this come as a new Holocaust? Do we ever learn a lesson?

Probably among all Western politicians the only clever guy who has seen the danger of so called "Arab Spring" is Kevin Rudd.

I have mentioned before how big British business have created a command centre in Qatar and have been supporting the

brotherhoods to topple the only progressive Arab countries in region while leaving intact the most backward states.

A very interesting issue here is how sometimes instead of learning from history we can use the current events to find a better

analysis of what has happened in the past. It was always a question for me that how it comes that British Kapos support a number

of very high ranking clergy and politicians in Iran. With the confusion that I had at the time about definition of "pro-Israeli"

the only clue was the old conspiracy theory that some British kapos were in fact helping Hitler for financial and strategic gains.

I had lauphed at this theory when I was younger but surprisingly have come to the conclusion that even if not true at that time

it can describe current situation in regards to so called "Arab spring". How on earth a person with Jewish background can

contribute to such so called "revolutions" when they end with coming to power of brotherhoods and pose a serious treat to security

of Israel? It has proved to me that as a real pro-Israely my definition of "Kapos" makes lots of sense. The kapos in British big

 businesses do not give a damn about Israel and with their actions are preparing the world for what their naive brotherhood friends call

"Armageddon". (The brother in law of one of the Kapos who then escaped to Qatar to help his Kapo friends was again and again referring to

Armageddon in 2012 while extensively spying on myself).

 Islamo fascists in Iran talk about Zionism a lot. I avoid using that word as it can

be an insult to Zion which may have a spiritual meaning for some people. I prefer "Jodu fascist" as proper name for these

Kapos. And mention to Iranian guys that Zionism (as they call it) was never an Israely thing. It begun in UK and

stil poor innocent Israeli population are the first victim of this disgusting betrayal by British Kapos and their

nasty brotherhoods.So here is the clear distinction criteria: when a leftist says they are "pro-Israeli" That really means

something. But when a right wing politician says that...please translate that as he/she being a Kapo who is sacrificing

Jews for interests of western world big businesses. That is why when President Obama talks about supporting Israel for me it is

the symbol of a deep sense of responsibility. recently ABS aired two speech one by a communist comrade who was talking about  Anders Behring Breivik being a anti-Semitic pro-Israeli !!!! In another speech a guest from Stanford university mentions a number of reasons why President Obama is not different from George Bush! and the most important thing is why he has not abandoned Israel! I have previously mentioned only a part of achievements of President Obama but for people who do not want to see the realities I add a couple more:

Both presidents used the words "we got'em". One of them after his British friends sexed up a dossier attacked one of the most progressive and secular governments in Arab world (list included Lybia, Syria, Egypt and Iraq, off course all non-democratic systems but at least secular). They captured one of the biggest enemies of Islamic fundamentalists and brotherhoods and then said with pride: We got'em. Several years later President Obama could settle the Iraqi problem that nobody (including myself) believed could be solved. Under his presidency American army captured one of the most important figures of brotherhoods and then president Obama said: We got'em. It can be well seen that under his presidency at the same time that US is supporting

democracy and freedom in Arab nations US has distanced itself from some nasty things that the British are doing.

Note: Above eccentric story that may even include links to other stories is pure fiction. Any similarity between the events or names of the characters,places and organisations with any real event or name is pure coincidence. I have rushed in publishing this and so this story is incomplete and needs editing for possible errors...will complete and correct later...